Sunday, January 3, 2010

The Green Lantern: Johnny Walker Green Label

The Johnny Walker Green Label is a vatted or pure malt* distilled by Johnny Walker & Sons (parent Diageo). The expression features 15yo minimum aged single malts from Diageo's 'Classic Malt' stable, namely:
  • Talisker (Isle of Skye)
  • Linkwood (Speyside, doesn't appear to be affiliated with Diageo)
  • Craggamore (Speyside)
  • Caol Ila (Isle of Islay)
I find the packaging, whilst having no bearing on taste, important for the portrayed story of the whisky, much like the cover of a book (for more details why, see here). Here we have the classic Johnny Walker square bottle, cork sealed, seemingly more refined than the Black Label. The box is a metallic green and presents the single malts used on the back with their key flavours.

On first whiff I note a peculiar blend of seaweed/salty air and a certain sweet-richness. This seems to indicate a level of complexity that I will probably not be able to give justice too and could be indicative of its blended pedigree. I recently heard someone say that they had tasted a blend so well balanced that they actually had difficulty identifying flavours. The sign of a good blend must surely be the balancing of many complex flavours.

On tasting you immediately get the iodine pepperiness associated with Talisker. The whisky sweetens through the mouth to sandlewood, before finishing with a very slight oak flavour. There maybe some burnt butter in there as well, which could be the Caol Ila peat-sweetness.

This is definitively not a beginners whisky, furthermore I feel its a 'quiet moment' whisky...something to dwell upon, a mystery woman with mysterious ways...so I try to get to know her slowly. I really enjoy the saltiness of the Green Label, but I struggle with the strong Caol Ila sweetness (I am not generally a fan of the Caol Ila malt). I keep finding my opinion changing on this whisky...does this have more to do with my uncommitted and indecisive nature? Notwithstanding this, it must be noted my post regarding 'mood & whisky' was prompted by the Green Label's multiple personality...a sweet lady one night and bitterly twisted the next. In the latter circumstances I recommend reducing the tasting to wee-small sips. A drop on the tongue, let the flavour unfurl without the threat of oral explosion occasionally induced with larger mouthfuls.

Anyway, enough of the vagaries. The alcoholic volume sits at 43%, but it feels more than that. The mouth feel is quite alcoholic and very rich in brine-saltiness.

If I was looking for a food companion, I would choose some game, maybe venison. Could also be a haggis whisky (not that I have ever had it), perhaps followed with a soft smelly cheese.

My internal dram-ometer points the needle towards 5.25 lightning bolts (from a possible 7). But I always think the question is: would I buy it again? Answer: Possibly. I would because it is the only pure malt I have had, with the exception of a small dram of Blue Label (sometime ago). But the Green Label hasn't been a 'go to' whisky for me. In fact I have drunk the whole bottle myself trying to write this review, my first review. If I did buy one I am sure my opinion would keep changing, no matter how many times I have it.

I think Bono best encapsulates this whisky, 'it's alright, [but] she moves in mysterious ways.'

Secretary,
D.W.T.C.

* pure or vatted malts can be (1) blended and bottled almost immediately; or (2) blended and further aged (or 'married') once in the cask. I am unsure if Johnny Walker chooses to marry its Green Label (or the Blue Label for that matter).

10 comments:

  1. And a fine first post it is too. I don't remember the saltiness you mention, but then I only had a couple of sips.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Richie,
    I don't recall any salt either, but my only experience of the green label was to smuggle a bottle onto a flight to Rome with a mate; and then get s&/!faced on the plane. In fairness I don't remember much about the trip at all, so there may have been lots of flavour.

    Great post Mr Secretary.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I was also indecisive on this whisky when I tried. One thing I def agree with is it's complexity. I guess the fact that the bottle is almost empty speaks for itself.

    Great review

    ReplyDelete
  4. I am sure Sigmund Freud would have something to say about your affair with the phallus that is the bottle, the relationship of the colour green, squares, and corks.

    Well if it is anything like that Suntory Hibiki blend it is like everything is right yet you cannot pick what you like about it.

    Ok so I am confused about Pure Malt vs Blended. Or is it that it is a collection of singles that have already been aged, then blended, and then the blend is aged again? Probably but I don't get it clearly.

    ReplyDelete
  5. maybe 'I Still Haven't Found What I'm Looking For' would be a better choice by the sounds.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Lidsters! Always got a tune for something.

    ReplyDelete
  7. To clarify the difference between a blended whisky and a vatted/pure malt whisky.

    A blended whisky (like Black Label or Red Label) will contain grain whisky, as well as singe malt whisky's. The master distiller will tell you they are added for 'flavour', the cynic will tell you it's because they are cheaper to produce.

    A vatted or pure malt ONLY contains single malt whisky's. Hence why you still pay the higher price for them. Other mentionable pure malts could include a line from The Famous Grouse, although I am unsure whether they are available in Australia (the cheaper blends definately are).

    ReplyDelete
  8. Great post! I'll always have a fondness in my heart for JW Green. This is the one that introduced me to the medicinal and peaty side of scotch whisky, and led me to the discovery of Talisker, followed by Caol Ila. Two of my favorites.

    Cheers,
    Jeff

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thanks Jeff H. I love the Talisker, but need to re-visit the Caol Ila, there is just something about its sweetness I struggle with. I am sure I would buy the JWG again, the flavours still perplex me...definately needs further investigation!

    ReplyDelete